MSC Warns Against Arctic Shipping Amid Debate Over Suez Canal’s Closure – gCaptain


maersk arctic

The Maersk containership Venta Maersk transits the Northern Sea Route on a one-off trial run of the Arctic route in September 2018. File Photo: Maersk

MSC Warns Against Arctic Shipping Amid Debate Over Suez Canal’s Closure

Mike Schuler April 1, 2021

Related News

Swiss shipping line MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company says it is doubling down on its commitment to avoid sending ships through the Arctic as some debate the need for alternative trade routes to the Suez Canal following the Ever Given grounding.

Company President Diego Aponte first made the pledge in 2019, promising that the company would not use the Northern Sea Route for shipping between Asia and Europe over environmental concerns, joining rivals CMA CGM, Hapag-Lloyd and others in making the pledge.

Now MSC’s new CEO, Soren Toft, a former Maersk executive who joined the company in December, is now reaffirming the company’s commitment to avoid the famed and increasingly accessible Arctic route, including Northeast and Northwest Passages.

The company says an expansion of Arctic shipping could increase emissions of so-called “black carbon”, which are physical particles of unburned carbon that can settle on land and ice and accelerate shrinking Arctic sea ice. It also cited navigational risks, which can result in fuel spills, air quality issues, and negatively impact marine biodiversity.

“As a responsible company, this was an obvious decision for us,” commented Toft. “MSC will not seek to cut through the melting ice of the Arctic to find a new route for commercial shipping and I consider this a position the whole shipping industry must adopt. Some of our peers have already made the same commitment to put the preservation of the Arctic environment ahead of profits. The Northern Sea Route is neither a quick fix for the current market challenges, nor a viable long-term strategy.”

Instead of seeking the shortest route for shipping through the Arctic, MSC said it will instead focus on reducing CO2 emissions through deploying bigger and more eco-friendly 24,000 TEU ships and look to new fuels and technologies to achieve a zero-carbon future.

MSC is now urging that that environmental concerns should not be overlooked amid the current debate over the impact of the COVID pandemic and impacts from the Suez Canal’s closure on supply chains, warning that “Arctic route exploitation is an unwarranted step in the wrong direction.”

“Attempting to open new navigation routes which skim the polar ice cap sounds like the ignorant ambition of an 18th century explorer, when today we know that this would pose further risks to humans and many other species in that region, as well as worsen the impact of shipping upon climate change,” said Bud Darr, Executive Vice President Maritime Policy & Government Affairs at MSC Group.

“MSC supports the decarbonisation targets of the UN International Maritime Organization, including complete decarbonization of shipping, and sees no overall merit in using this potential trade route. The risks and impacts outweigh the benefits of the shorter transits. There are no shortcuts toward genuine decarbonization of shipping and this is a shortcut that should definitely be avoided,” Darr added.

Shipping in Arctic has been growing steadily in recent years primarily driven by Russian exports from its northern Siberia fields. In terms of container shipping, however, as of now there seems to be little interest from the sector.

In September 2018, Maersk did send one of its new Baltic feeder vessels on a one-off passage of the Northern Sea Route on its maiden voyage from Asia to Northern Europe. Despite the success of the voyage, Maersk underscored that the passage was a one-off trial designed to gain operational experience in to region and to test vessel systems.

Unrelated to the Arctic, shipping sources are now indicating that there is now growing pressure for the Suez Canal to move quickly to upgrade its technical infrastructure in order avoid future shipping disruption after the Ever Given grounding threw international supply chains into disarray, forcing many ships to re-route around Africa.

Leave a Reply

SSCP   CAS-002   9L0-066   350-050   642-999   220-801   74-678   642-732   400-051   ICGB   c2010-652   70-413   101-400   220-902   350-080   210-260   70-246   1Z0-144   3002   AWS-SYSOPS   70-347   PEGACPBA71V1   220-901   70-534   LX0-104   070-461   HP0-S42   1Z0-061   000-105   70-486   70-177   N10-006   500-260   640-692   70-980   CISM   VCP550   70-532   200-101   000-080   PR000041   2V0-621   70-411   352-001   70-480   70-461   ICBB   000-089   70-410   350-029   1Z0-060   2V0-620   210-065   70-463   70-483   CRISC   MB6-703   1z0-808   220-802   ITILFND   1Z0-804   LX0-103   MB2-704   210-060   101   200-310   640-911   200-120   EX300   300-209   1Z0-803   350-001   400-201   9L0-012   70-488   JN0-102   640-916   70-270   100-101   MB5-705   JK0-022   350-060   300-320   1z0-434   350-018   400-101   350-030   000-106   ADM-201   300-135   300-208   EX200   PMP   NSE4   1Z0-051   c2010-657   C_TFIN52_66   300-115   70-417   9A0-385   70-243   300-075   70-487   NS0-157   MB2-707   70-533   CAP   OG0-093   M70-101   300-070   102-400   JN0-360   SY0-401   000-017   300-206   CCA-500   70-412   2V0-621D   70-178   810-403   70-462   OG0-091   1V0-601   200-355   000-104   700-501   70-346   CISSP   300-101   1Y0-201   200-125  , 200-125  , 100-105  , 100-105  , CISM   NS0-157   350-018  , NS0-157   ICBB  , N10-006 test  , 350-050   70-534   70-178   220-802   102-400   000-106   70-411  , 400-101   100-101  , NS0-157   1Z0-803   200-125  , 210-060   400-201   350-050   C_TFIN52_66  , JN0-102  , 200-355   JN0-360   70-411   350-018  , 70-412   350-030   640-916   000-105   100-105  , 70-270  , 70-462   300-070  , 300-070   642-999   101-400   PR000041   200-101  , 350-030   300-070  , 70-270  , 400-051   200-120   70-178   9L0-012   70-487   LX0-103   100-105  ,