Gard Highlights Issues with Improper Scrubber Installation

0 comments

Gard Highlights Issues with Improper Scrubber Installation

at
Last month, a video of what is believed to be a scrubber piping failure went viral on social media (Video still / Contents not endorsed by Gard)

By The Maritime Executive 2019-10-21

In new guidance for shipowners, marine insurer Gard advises its members that the installation of scrubber units must be carefully monitored in order to minimize the risk of premature corrosion and potential piping failure. Additional potential casualties from improper workmanship include the possibility of sparking a fire within the unit during shipyard hot work and the failure of poorly-executed shipyard welds during operation. With these factors in mind, Gard advises shipowners to monitor and evaluate their shipyard’s work to ensure a proper installation. 

Rapid corrosion is a significant concern for scrubber discharge piping. The washwater exiting the scrubber tower is acidic, and all piping routing the effluent to the overboard discharge must be painted internally with a protective coating. The absence of or poor application of the coating, along with poor application of paint on the outer hull plating near the discharge port, have been identified as potential causes of dramatically accelerated corrosion. Gard has already seen a few incidents where the overboard discharge piping has corroded away within about a year’s time, resulting in water ingress into the engine room, ballast tanks or cargo holds. The damage required temporary repairs by divers and permanent repairs at a shipyard. 

During installation, the yard also has to perform considerable amounts of welding to build a new compartment to accommodate the scrubber tower and affix the scrubber to the vessel’s superstructure. Gard has seen several incidents in which sparks from hot work got into the scrubber’s inner chamber through uncovered openings and ignited flammable material inside. Shipyard workers may not be aware that the scrubber contains combustible components, and in several of these incidents, it emerged that the crew had asked the yard workers to cover over the openings in the scrubber but the workers failed to do so. In all cases, the fire was extinguished, but not without damage to the brand-new scrubber. 

Gard has also observed damage to the scrubber from thermal shock when switching from “dry” mode – washwater turned off – back to normal operation. After departing a port with a scrubber ban, a ship started up its scrubber’s washwater pumps, spraying cold seawater through nozzles which had previously been exposed to hot exhaust gas. During a subsequent inspection, damage was observed to the nozzles, demister housing and drains. The causes included thermal shock, poor design and poor installation welding on support structures. 

To avoid these issues, Gard recommends careful supervision by the shipowner during shipyard installation. In addition, it recommends that owners may wish to approach their scrubber manufacturer to request information about technical failures which may have occurred aboard other vessels carrying the same unit. 

Leave a Reply

SSCP   CAS-002   9L0-066   350-050   642-999   220-801   74-678   642-732   400-051   ICGB   c2010-652   70-413   101-400   220-902   350-080   210-260   70-246   1Z0-144   3002   AWS-SYSOPS   70-347   PEGACPBA71V1   220-901   70-534   LX0-104   070-461   HP0-S42   1Z0-061   000-105   70-486   70-177   N10-006   500-260   640-692   70-980   CISM   VCP550   70-532   200-101   000-080   PR000041   2V0-621   70-411   352-001   70-480   70-461   ICBB   000-089   70-410   350-029   1Z0-060   2V0-620   210-065   70-463   70-483   CRISC   MB6-703   1z0-808   220-802   ITILFND   1Z0-804   LX0-103   MB2-704   210-060   101   200-310   640-911   200-120   EX300   300-209   1Z0-803   350-001   400-201   9L0-012   70-488   JN0-102   640-916   70-270   100-101   MB5-705   JK0-022   350-060   300-320   1z0-434   350-018   400-101   350-030   000-106   ADM-201   300-135   300-208   EX200   PMP   NSE4   1Z0-051   c2010-657   C_TFIN52_66   300-115   70-417   9A0-385   70-243   300-075   70-487   NS0-157   MB2-707   70-533   CAP   OG0-093   M70-101   300-070   102-400   JN0-360   SY0-401   000-017   300-206   CCA-500   70-412   2V0-621D   70-178   810-403   70-462   OG0-091   1V0-601   200-355   000-104   700-501   70-346   CISSP   300-101   1Y0-201   200-125  , 200-125  , 100-105  , 100-105  , CISM   NS0-157   350-018  , NS0-157   ICBB  , N10-006 test  , 350-050   70-534   70-178   220-802   102-400   000-106   70-411  , 400-101   100-101  , NS0-157   1Z0-803   200-125  , 210-060   400-201   350-050   C_TFIN52_66  , JN0-102  , 200-355   JN0-360   70-411   350-018  , 70-412   350-030   640-916   000-105   100-105  , 70-270  , 70-462   300-070  , 300-070   642-999   101-400   PR000041   200-101  , 350-030   300-070  , 70-270  , 400-051   200-120   70-178   9L0-012   70-487   LX0-103   100-105  ,