Industry Questions New Box Ship Blockchain Network


Industry Questions New Box Ship Blockchain Network

shipping container port
Photo: Mr. Amarin Jitnathum / Shutterstock

By Alex Lennane (The Loadstar) – Tuesday’s announcement that five shipping lines and four terminal operators are to form a consortium to develop a Global Shipping Business Network (GSBN) has raised more questions than it answered.

GSBN will be a blockchain-enabled platform that will help digitise the industry, set standards and transform documentation flows, the companies said.

The participants comprise Ocean Alliance members CMA CGM, Cosco/ OOCL and Evergreen – but also, interestingly THE alliance partner Yang Ming, as well as DP World, Hutchison Ports, PSA and Shanghai International Port. The tech company is CargoSmart.

The announcement immediately drew comparison with the Maersk/IBM effort, TradeLens, which has been criticised for alienating much-needed potential partners because of Maersk’s heavy involvement.

One port source on Twitter noted yesterday: “Can’t help thinking that any line’s proprietary blockchain solution is going to struggle with universal, or even widespread, acceptance.”

Stefan Kukman, CEO of blockchain specialist CargoX, said: “Of course we are glad to see distributed ledger technology gather interest in the market, and for companies to rely on it. But seeing such initiatives, numerous questions arise. This obviously is not an independent platform, as it is created by the consortium of powerful runner-ups to the Maersk/IBM duo.

“How will private data be handled? What processes will be covered in the platform? Will it be open to other services, such as the CargoX Smart B/L(TM), for example? Will it have vendor lock-in by default, or will it enable companies to take out their private data and process it in their own way?”

He added: “If they are going to develop from scratch, such processes can take a long time, especially if specific private interests of the consortium members will need to be catered to.”

While CargoSmart failed to respond to The Loadstar, the press release confirmed that the platform would connect to other consortium networks.

It also said it would develop a “digital baseline for standards – an industry-wide common, trusted and expansive digital model provides a foundation for highly collaborative initiatives and market intelligence”.

However, further details are as yet unclear. One fear is that with various consortia looking to develop industry standards, they may not end up being industry-wide.

At the Global Liner Shipping Conference in March, Peter Wolf, general manager Germany for CMA CGM, a member of the new platform, said the only realistic way forward was a digital solution in which five to seven of the biggest lines jointly developed a platform.

And Hapag-Lloyd chief Rolf Habben Jansen, which as part of THE Alliance has yet to join a digital platform, said at the conference that although the Maersk/ IBM platform could be good, it had to be industry-wide.

“This is the weakness we’re currently seeing in many of these initiatives, as each individual project claims to offer an industry platform that they themselves control. This is self-contradictory.”

Mr Kukman warned: “This is about the digitalisation of the industry as a whole. Service and solution providers who do not open their data models, processes, and data transaction technology to other participants in the market, might do more damage than good for the whole industry, and blockchain technology specifically.

“We hope the consortium will develop in the right direction, as everybody can benefit from that. Just imagine, big systems, such as CargoSmart, TradeLens and CargoX being interconnectable, to offer smooth collaboration.”

With THE Alliance member Yang Ming involved in the new platform, one shipping observer noted: “This will add to chatter on the pressure for Evergreen to take Yang Ming under its wing.”

The Loadstar is fast becoming known at the highest levels of logistics and supply chain management as one of the best sources of influential analysis and commentary.

Check them out at, or find them on Facebook and Twitter.

Leave a Reply

SSCP   CAS-002   9L0-066   350-050   642-999   220-801   74-678   642-732   400-051   ICGB   c2010-652   70-413   101-400   220-902   350-080   210-260   70-246   1Z0-144   3002   AWS-SYSOPS   70-347   PEGACPBA71V1   220-901   70-534   LX0-104   070-461   HP0-S42   1Z0-061   000-105   70-486   70-177   N10-006   500-260   640-692   70-980   CISM   VCP550   70-532   200-101   000-080   PR000041   2V0-621   70-411   352-001   70-480   70-461   ICBB   000-089   70-410   350-029   1Z0-060   2V0-620   210-065   70-463   70-483   CRISC   MB6-703   1z0-808   220-802   ITILFND   1Z0-804   LX0-103   MB2-704   210-060   101   200-310   640-911   200-120   EX300   300-209   1Z0-803   350-001   400-201   9L0-012   70-488   JN0-102   640-916   70-270   100-101   MB5-705   JK0-022   350-060   300-320   1z0-434   350-018   400-101   350-030   000-106   ADM-201   300-135   300-208   EX200   PMP   NSE4   1Z0-051   c2010-657   C_TFIN52_66   300-115   70-417   9A0-385   70-243   300-075   70-487   NS0-157   MB2-707   70-533   CAP   OG0-093   M70-101   300-070   102-400   JN0-360   SY0-401   000-017   300-206   CCA-500   70-412   2V0-621D   70-178   810-403   70-462   OG0-091   1V0-601   200-355   000-104   700-501   70-346   CISSP   300-101   1Y0-201   200-125  , 200-125  , 100-105  , 100-105  , CISM   NS0-157   350-018  , NS0-157   ICBB  , N10-006 test  , 350-050   70-534   70-178   220-802   102-400   000-106   70-411  , 400-101   100-101  , NS0-157   1Z0-803   200-125  , 210-060   400-201   350-050   C_TFIN52_66  , JN0-102  , 200-355   JN0-360   70-411   350-018  , 70-412   350-030   640-916   000-105   100-105  , 70-270  , 70-462   300-070  , 300-070   642-999   101-400   PR000041   200-101  , 350-030   300-070  , 70-270  , 400-051   200-120   70-178   9L0-012   70-487   LX0-103   100-105  ,