Economist Who Called U.S.-China Trade War Sees Deal in 2019

0 comments

Economist Who Called U.S.-China Trade War Sees Deal in 2019

An economist who accurately predicted the rising trade tensions between the U.S. and China now sees a likely resolution of the dispute next year.

A trade deal may be reached at some point in 2019 as tariffs will start to hurt the U.S., Danske Bank A/S chief analyst and China economist Allan von Mehren wrote in a report last week, just before President Donald Trump tweeted that discussions with Chinese President Xi Jinping are “moving along nicely.”

Following the tweet, the strategist now sees a 60 percent chance of a positive outcome from a planned Trump-Xi meeting at the Group of 20 summit in Argentina from Nov. 30-Dec. 1, up from 50 percent earlier, he said in an email response to questions on Thursday. A positive outcome would mean “a clear framework for negotiation with a list of demands and a plan to go work on them one by one.”

Tensions may yet worsen before a deal can be reached, as Trump is likely to expand U.S. tariffs against Chinese imports, Mehren said. The U.S. is preparing to announce by early December tariffs on all remaining imports from China if talks at the G-20 meeting fail to ease the trade war, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg.

“Trump’s goal is a deal. Tariffs are just a weapon,” Mehren said. “The tariffs and Chinese retaliation will also hurt the U.S. economy, so it is not sustainable.”

Copenhagen-based Mehren said in a December 2017 report that the risk of a tit-for-tat trade conflict over the coming year had increased and that the U.S. may take action in areas such as intellectual property rights, aluminum and steel, triggering retaliation by China. Since then, the U.S. has levied tariffs on $250 billion of imported Chinese goods. An escalation of the trade war has driven the yuan to its weakest level against the dollar in a decade and led to losses of nearly 20 percent in the Shanghai Composite Index.

Barriers to a possible trade deal remain as Beijing will continue to push ahead with its Made in China 2025 plan, the state-driven strategy to boost China’s high tech industries, according to Mehren. Still, Trump may be compelled to strike a deal if tensions start to hurt the world’s largest economy and U.S. companies are sidelined in China, he said.

A trade deal may end up resembling a Chinese offer in May, Mehren said. This may include:

-China will buy a further $70 billion to $100 billion of U.S. goods
-Take steps to strengthen intellectual property rights
-Reduce tariffs further
-No longer demand transfer of technology in joint ventures
-Further open up direct investments
-Improve conditions for foreign companies in China
-Invite U.S. companies to play a bigger role in the Made-in-China 2025 strategy through investment

Mehren’s prediction of a positive outcome from the Trump-Xi meeting this month is more optimistic than other policy watchers. BNY Mellon strategist Lale Akoner said last week the summit won’t resolve any major trade issues. George Magnus, an associate at the University of Oxford China Centre in U.K. and former chief economist at UBS, said in a series of tweets that markets shouldn’t expect too much from the meeting.

Mehren said he doesn’t rule out Trump trying to talk up markets before the mid-term elections on Tuesday and cautioned that time is needed for the U.S. and China to reach an agreement.

“A ceasefire is no guarantee of a quick deal. A real deal will take time to negotiate and there are likely to be setbacks along the way,” Mehren said. “Volatility is likely to remain but, ultimately, we do expect a deal to be made at some point in 2019.”
Source: Bloomberg

An economist who accurately predicted the rising trade tensions between the U.S. and China now sees a likely resolution of the dispute next year.

A trade deal may be reached at some point in 2019 as tariffs will start to hurt the U.S., Danske Bank A/S chief analyst and China economist Allan von Mehren wrote in a report last week, just before President Donald Trump tweeted that discussions with Chinese President Xi Jinping are “moving along nicely.”

Following the tweet, the strategist now sees a 60 percent chance of a positive outcome from a planned Trump-Xi meeting at the Group of 20 summit in Argentina from Nov. 30-Dec. 1, up from 50 percent earlier, he said in an email response to questions on Thursday. A positive outcome would mean “a clear framework for negotiation with a list of demands and a plan to go work on them one by one.”

Tensions may yet worsen before a deal can be reached, as Trump is likely to expand U.S. tariffs against Chinese imports, Mehren said. The U.S. is preparing to announce by early December tariffs on all remaining imports from China if talks at the G-20 meeting fail to ease the trade war, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg.

“Trump’s goal is a deal. Tariffs are just a weapon,” Mehren said. “The tariffs and Chinese retaliation will also hurt the U.S. economy, so it is not sustainable.”

Copenhagen-based Mehren said in a December 2017 report that the risk of a tit-for-tat trade conflict over the coming year had increased and that the U.S. may take action in areas such as intellectual property rights, aluminum and steel, triggering retaliation by China. Since then, the U.S. has levied tariffs on $250 billion of imported Chinese goods. An escalation of the trade war has driven the yuan to its weakest level against the dollar in a decade and led to losses of nearly 20 percent in the Shanghai Composite Index.

Barriers to a possible trade deal remain as Beijing will continue to push ahead with its Made in China 2025 plan, the state-driven strategy to boost China’s high tech industries, according to Mehren. Still, Trump may be compelled to strike a deal if tensions start to hurt the world’s largest economy and U.S. companies are sidelined in China, he said.

A trade deal may end up resembling a Chinese offer in May, Mehren said. This may include:

-China will buy a further $70 billion to $100 billion of U.S. goods
-Take steps to strengthen intellectual property rights
-Reduce tariffs further
-No longer demand transfer of technology in joint ventures
-Further open up direct investments
-Improve conditions for foreign companies in China
-Invite U.S. companies to play a bigger role in the Made-in-China 2025 strategy through investment

Mehren’s prediction of a positive outcome from the Trump-Xi meeting this month is more optimistic than other policy watchers. BNY Mellon strategist Lale Akoner said last week the summit won’t resolve any major trade issues. George Magnus, an associate at the University of Oxford China Centre in U.K. and former chief economist at UBS, said in a series of tweets that markets shouldn’t expect too much from the meeting.

Mehren said he doesn’t rule out Trump trying to talk up markets before the mid-term elections on Tuesday and cautioned that time is needed for the U.S. and China to reach an agreement.

“A ceasefire is no guarantee of a quick deal. A real deal will take time to negotiate and there are likely to be setbacks along the way,” Mehren said. “Volatility is likely to remain but, ultimately, we do expect a deal to be made at some point in 2019.”
Source: Bloomberg

Leave a Reply

SSCP   CAS-002   9L0-066   350-050   642-999   220-801   74-678   642-732   400-051   ICGB   c2010-652   70-413   101-400   220-902   350-080   210-260   70-246   1Z0-144   3002   AWS-SYSOPS   70-347   PEGACPBA71V1   220-901   70-534   LX0-104   070-461   HP0-S42   1Z0-061   000-105   70-486   70-177   N10-006   500-260   640-692   70-980   CISM   VCP550   70-532   200-101   000-080   PR000041   2V0-621   70-411   352-001   70-480   70-461   ICBB   000-089   70-410   350-029   1Z0-060   2V0-620   210-065   70-463   70-483   CRISC   MB6-703   1z0-808   220-802   ITILFND   1Z0-804   LX0-103   MB2-704   210-060   101   200-310   640-911   200-120   EX300   300-209   1Z0-803   350-001   400-201   9L0-012   70-488   JN0-102   640-916   70-270   100-101   MB5-705   JK0-022   350-060   300-320   1z0-434   350-018   400-101   350-030   000-106   ADM-201   300-135   300-208   EX200   PMP   NSE4   1Z0-051   c2010-657   C_TFIN52_66   300-115   70-417   9A0-385   70-243   300-075   70-487   NS0-157   MB2-707   70-533   CAP   OG0-093   M70-101   300-070   102-400   JN0-360   SY0-401   000-017   300-206   CCA-500   70-412   2V0-621D   70-178   810-403   70-462   OG0-091   1V0-601   200-355   000-104   700-501   70-346   CISSP   300-101   1Y0-201   200-125  , 200-125  , 100-105  , 100-105  , CISM   NS0-157   350-018  , NS0-157   ICBB  , N10-006 test  , 350-050   70-534   70-178   220-802   102-400   000-106   70-411  , 400-101   100-101  , NS0-157   1Z0-803   200-125  , 210-060   400-201   350-050   C_TFIN52_66  , JN0-102  , 200-355   JN0-360   70-411   350-018  , 70-412   350-030   640-916   000-105   100-105  , 70-270  , 70-462   300-070  , 300-070   642-999   101-400   PR000041   200-101  , 350-030   300-070  , 70-270  , 400-051   200-120   70-178   9L0-012   70-487   LX0-103   100-105  ,