The impact of the IMO GHG Strategy on shipping

0 comments

The impact of the IMO GHG Strategy on shipping

In this guest blog, Tore Longva from DNV GL Maritime explains all the different ways by which emissions regulation will be an industry game-changer.

The key environmental challenge for shipping will be in the short term to comply with the global 0.5% sulphur limit in 2020, and in the longer term to achieve the ambitions of the recently adopted IMO Greenhouse Gas (GHG) strategy. Both will have a transformative impact on how the world’s fleet is fuelled.

The GHG strategy includes a vision to decarbonise shipping as soon as possible within this century, with the further aim to reduce total GHG emissions from shipping at least by 50% in 2050, and to reduce the average carbon intensity (CO2 per tonne-mile) by 40% in 2030 and 70% in 2050, compared to 2008.

Can we expect that these targets will be achieved? The IMO GHG targets are ambitious and will require application of currently immature technologies and solutions, acceptance of lower speed and deployment of large volumes of carbon-neutral fuels. Such fuels will also be essential to achieve the IMO vision to fully decarbonise shipping somewhere between 2050 and 2100.

Although the IMO’s ambition is clear, its conversion into practical regulations is still unclear. To meet its targets, the strategy must be followed by mandatory requirements for individual ships, and by other policy measures to support development and implementation of new technologies and fuels.

In our ‘Maritime Forecast to 2050’, published in September 2018, DNV GL has made a projection of energy use in international shipping, assuming that regulations and policy measures are put in place to incentivise the necessary emission reduction.

We predict that fuel consumption per tonne-mile will decline 30% on average due to energy-efficiency measures, mainly hull and machinery improvements and speed reduction. Total energy use in international shipping will increase from about 11.2 EJ in 2017 to a peak of 12.7 EJ in 2035 and then decrease to 11.1 EJ in 2050. This equates to 267 Mtoe in 2050 of which 90 Mtoe heavy fuel oil (HFO)/marine gas oil (MGO); 61 Mtoe LNG; 99 MToe carbon-neutral fuels; 3.6 MToe hydrogen and an additional 159 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity.

Energy use in shipping towards 2050 (Source: Maritime Forecast to 2050, DNV GL 2018)

Carbon-neutral fuels are a big bag of possible fuels, ranging from biofuels and electricity to hydrogen and ammonia. The common denominator is that they are carbon-neutral in a life-cycle perspective. We have not projected which of these fuels will be further developed and implemented. The many alternative fuels, and their sprawling characteristics, make it difficult to clearly identify winners and losers at this point in time.

Shipping has always had to manage risk and uncertainty. On top of the well-known, cyclic ups and downs of the shipping markets, history is rich with examples of external shocks or events that have caused significant changes to the industry. These include commercial game-changers like containerisation, technological break-throughs like the transition from sail to steam power, or radical regulations such as the double-hull requirements imposed on tankers.

However, looking back 100 years, we find very recognisable ships. The main changes have been on ship size and cargo types, and not on design and fuel. Given the above trends and drivers, can we expect that the ships built in 10 and 20 years will be as similar as those sailing today?
Source: UK Chamber of Shipping

Leave a Reply

SSCP   CAS-002   9L0-066   350-050   642-999   220-801   74-678   642-732   400-051   ICGB   c2010-652   70-413   101-400   220-902   350-080   210-260   70-246   1Z0-144   3002   AWS-SYSOPS   70-347   PEGACPBA71V1   220-901   70-534   LX0-104   070-461   HP0-S42   1Z0-061   000-105   70-486   70-177   N10-006   500-260   640-692   70-980   CISM   VCP550   70-532   200-101   000-080   PR000041   2V0-621   70-411   352-001   70-480   70-461   ICBB   000-089   70-410   350-029   1Z0-060   2V0-620   210-065   70-463   70-483   CRISC   MB6-703   1z0-808   220-802   ITILFND   1Z0-804   LX0-103   MB2-704   210-060   101   200-310   640-911   200-120   EX300   300-209   1Z0-803   350-001   400-201   9L0-012   70-488   JN0-102   640-916   70-270   100-101   MB5-705   JK0-022   350-060   300-320   1z0-434   350-018   400-101   350-030   000-106   ADM-201   300-135   300-208   EX200   PMP   NSE4   1Z0-051   c2010-657   C_TFIN52_66   300-115   70-417   9A0-385   70-243   300-075   70-487   NS0-157   MB2-707   70-533   CAP   OG0-093   M70-101   300-070   102-400   JN0-360   SY0-401   000-017   300-206   CCA-500   70-412   2V0-621D   70-178   810-403   70-462   OG0-091   1V0-601   200-355   000-104   700-501   70-346   CISSP   300-101   1Y0-201   200-125  , 200-125  , 100-105  , 100-105  , CISM   NS0-157   350-018  , NS0-157   ICBB  , N10-006 test  , 350-050   70-534   70-178   220-802   102-400   000-106   70-411  , 400-101   100-101  , NS0-157   1Z0-803   200-125  , 210-060   400-201   350-050   C_TFIN52_66  , JN0-102  , 200-355   JN0-360   70-411   350-018  , 70-412   350-030   640-916   000-105   100-105  , 70-270  , 70-462   300-070  , 300-070   642-999   101-400   PR000041   200-101  , 350-030   300-070  , 70-270  , 400-051   200-120   70-178   9L0-012   70-487   LX0-103   100-105  ,