The National Hurricane Center Recorded an 83-Foot Wave Height Associated with Florence. It Could Be An Error, But Maybe Not

0 comments

The National Hurricane Center Recorded an 83-Foot Wave Height Associated with Florence. It Could Be An Error, But Maybe Not

Image posted Wednesday by NHC TAFB showing wave height up to 83 feet (25 meters). Credit: NOAA

My eye lit up in amazement Wednesday morning after I scrolled to a tweet by the National Hurricane Center’s Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch claiming that satellite radar picked up a significant wave height of 83-feet in the northeast quadrant of Hurricane Florence.

My mind was blown, along with the others who shared, retweeted and commented on the post. A wave significant wave height of 83-feet is enormous. That’s 25 meters!

NHC_TAFB

@NHC_TAFB

Wave heights to 83 ft were measured early this morning under the NE quadrant of Hurricane Florence. These enormous waves are produced by being trapped along with very strong winds moving in the same direction the storm’s motion. http://hurricanes.gov/marine 

One thing to keep in mind is when measuring wave heights, scientists use significant wave heights, a measurement that takes the average of the highest one-third of waves. Because it is an average, individual waves can always be taller, sometimes a lot taller.

Also, the best and most accurate way to track wave heights is by using buoy data. However, buoys are stationary and mostly near-shore, so they aren’t always in the right place at the right time. To account for this lack of data, forecasters rely on satellites that use altimeter radar to determine wave height. While good, the data can be less reliable due to some factors, such as weather conditions.

We regularly see 16-meter, 17m, even 18m or more waves in places like the Bering Sea and N. Atlantic primarily associated with powerful hurricane-force winter storms. In fact, the tallest wave height ever recorded, according to the World Meteorological Organization, was measured in 2013 by a buoy located somewhere between Iceland and the United Kingdom. The wave came in at monstrous 19-meters – that’s 62 feet, which is tall enough that the thought alone will send shivers down your spine!

So 83-feet when I saw that tweet from the NHC TAFB, I just had to find out the real story on this.

To do so, I reached out to Chris Landsea, Chief of the Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch at NOAA, who explained a little bit about this mind-boggling wave height reading. According to Chris, the 83-feet wave height was tracked during a satellite pass early Wednesday morning. The team at TAFB initially thought the reading was accurate, even though forecasts were calling for wave heights closer to 50-feet.

But, as it turns out, when storms like Florence are traveling in a straight line, enormous waves can occur by being trapped along with very strong winds moving in the same direction as the storm’s motion. At the same time, when there are bands are extremely heavy rain, radar sometimes misinterprets the rain as waves, producing incorrect data.

Now, whether or not there was an 83-foot wave in the northeast quadrant of Hurricane Florence yesterday morning, I don’t think we’ll ever know for sure. But whether 85 feet or 55 feet, at the end of the day does it really even matter? Those are seas that you do not want to mess with.

Leave a Reply

SSCP   CAS-002   9L0-066   350-050   642-999   220-801   74-678   642-732   400-051   ICGB   c2010-652   70-413   101-400   220-902   350-080   210-260   70-246   1Z0-144   3002   AWS-SYSOPS   70-347   PEGACPBA71V1   220-901   70-534   LX0-104   070-461   HP0-S42   1Z0-061   000-105   70-486   70-177   N10-006   500-260   640-692   70-980   CISM   VCP550   70-532   200-101   000-080   PR000041   2V0-621   70-411   352-001   70-480   70-461   ICBB   000-089   70-410   350-029   1Z0-060   2V0-620   210-065   70-463   70-483   CRISC   MB6-703   1z0-808   220-802   ITILFND   1Z0-804   LX0-103   MB2-704   210-060   101   200-310   640-911   200-120   EX300   300-209   1Z0-803   350-001   400-201   9L0-012   70-488   JN0-102   640-916   70-270   100-101   MB5-705   JK0-022   350-060   300-320   1z0-434   350-018   400-101   350-030   000-106   ADM-201   300-135   300-208   EX200   PMP   NSE4   1Z0-051   c2010-657   C_TFIN52_66   300-115   70-417   9A0-385   70-243   300-075   70-487   NS0-157   MB2-707   70-533   CAP   OG0-093   M70-101   300-070   102-400   JN0-360   SY0-401   000-017   300-206   CCA-500   70-412   2V0-621D   70-178   810-403   70-462   OG0-091   1V0-601   200-355   000-104   700-501   70-346   CISSP   300-101   1Y0-201   200-125  , 200-125  , 100-105  , 100-105  , CISM   NS0-157   350-018  , NS0-157   ICBB  , N10-006 test  , 350-050   70-534   70-178   220-802   102-400   000-106   70-411  , 400-101   100-101  , NS0-157   1Z0-803   200-125  , 210-060   400-201   350-050   C_TFIN52_66  , JN0-102  , 200-355   JN0-360   70-411   350-018  , 70-412   350-030   640-916   000-105   100-105  , 70-270  , 70-462   300-070  , 300-070   642-999   101-400   PR000041   200-101  , 350-030   300-070  , 70-270  , 400-051   200-120   70-178   9L0-012   70-487   LX0-103   100-105  ,